Say what the speaker wants to prove, then find the gap between reason and conclusion: filling it strengthens, widening it weakens.
- 1Strengthening8:32
- 2Strengthening with Evidence8:23
- Now playing: 3Identifying Flaws8:28
- 4Weakening9:00
- 5Strengthening and Weakening9:51
Argument Analysis: Identifying Flaws

Methods in this video
Tap a time to jump to where the video teaches that method.
- 1
What else could it be?
When to use it: The question asks which sentence shows the mistake, and the conclusion says 'must', 'can only' or 'so it is'; or a two-speaker question where the box lists only what usually or sometimes happens.
- Treat every given fact as true; the flaw is in the 'so' step.
- Circle 'must' and make up a story where every fact holds but the conclusion fails.
- Your story is what they assumed without saying it; a story that leaves the conclusion standing does not count.
- 2
Where did the number come from?
When to use it: In a flaw question the evidence is a number, or something that never happened (no one caught in five years, 14 hats left in the box).
- When you see a number, ask how it came about.
- Something else may have shaped it: no one caught may mean no one dared; what is left is not everything that happened.
- For an option that sounds like criticism, check whose side it is really on.
Practise exam-style questions with these methods
Free 7-day trial, no credit card required.