Say what the speaker wants to prove, then find the gap between reason and conclusion: filling it strengthens, widening it weakens.
- 1Strengthening8:32
- 2Strengthening with Evidence8:23
- 3Identifying Flaws8:28
- Now playing: 4Weakening9:00
- 5Strengthening and Weakening9:51
Argument Analysis: Weakening

Methods in this video
Tap a time to jump to where the video teaches that method.
- 1
Same result, a different cause
When to use it: Someone takes something they saw or a number (more people hurt at one time of day, a ball returned faster than anyone could react, a high win rate, fewer visitors) and decides what caused it; the question asks what most weakens the argument.
- Separate what they saw from why they say it happened. The fact can be true while the cause is wrong.
- Ask what else could cause the same result. For big numbers, check how many took part; for great performances, check opponents, chances and preparation.
- Pick the option that keeps what they saw and gives it a different cause; one that sounds like a correction but backs them up does not weaken.
- 2
Test the reason with a counterexample
When to use it: The key reason is a general statement (space research does nothing for life on Earth, a good gardener needs no help to name plants, pets are forced to perform, over time glass flows downwards); the question asks what most weakens the argument.
- Shrink the key reason to one sentence and circle words like nothing, without and all.
- Find a case of the same kind that does not fit. One real counterexample is enough; so is a missing result where his cause should show most.
- Watch for options that help him: criticising the other side's tool, a same-direction comparison, or a benefit that lands somewhere else.
Practise exam-style questions with these methods
Free 7-day trial, no credit card required.